Relative pronouns

Ciamar a chanas mi.... / How do I say...
JoP
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:59 am
Corrections: I'm fine either way
Location: Northumberland

Relative pronouns

Unread post by JoP »

How do you distinguish between

"It is they who hit me"

and

"It is they whom I hit"

Because there are no accusative pronouns and the word order is always verb-subject or verb-object they both seem to me to be

'S e iadson a bhuail mi

Also how would you say

"The house where I was born"

Do you have to say "The house in which I was born"

and is that something like

An taigh anns an rugadh mi (? d'rugadh mi)


GunChleoc
Rianaire
Posts: 4607
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:26 am
Language Level: Mion-chùiseach
Corrections: Please correct my grammar
Location: Dùthaich mo chridhe
Contact:

Unread post by GunChleoc »

'S e iadsan a bhuail mi - It is them I hit. You can switch that around to 'S e mise a bhuail iad - It is me they hit.

The neutral constructions would be:

Bhuail iad mi - they hit me
Bhuail mi iad - I hit them

The house where I was born - An taigh far a rugadh me. Far a takes the relative form, which only exists in the future. In all other tenses, you just use the independent form instead.
Oileanach chànan chuthachail
Na dealbhan agam
neoni
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:57 pm
Corrections: I'm fine either way
Location: am badeigin

Unread post by neoni »

this is one of the ambiguities in gaelic

's iad a bhuail mi
means "i hit them (it's them i hit)" and "they hit me (it's they that hit me)"
and in the same sense
's mise a bhuail iad
can mean "they hit me (it's me that they hit)" and "i hit them (it's me that hit them)"

when you first learn this it seems like it would cause problems, but i've never run into any confusion with it at all.

i would say "an taigh san (anns an) do rugadh mi" for "the house in which i was born", and i think "far an do rugadh" for things like this is an anglicism, but i'm not sure. i don't use it though.

The house where I was born - An taigh far a rugadh me. Far a takes the relative form, which only exists in the future. In all other tenses, you just use the independent form instead.
far takes the interrogative form (in all tenses), not the relative. it works the same as "air a bheil" "anns an robh" "aig nach bi" etc
faoileag
Maor
Posts: 1505
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:19 am

Unread post by faoileag »

'Far' is unlike the other conjunctions/relative pronouns, which DO tale the relative/independent, because it runs parallel to 'Càite`. That makes it easier to remember. :D

Càit am bi thu a-maireach? Bidh mi far am bi mi an-còmhnaidh - aig m' obair!

Cuin a bhios tu ann? Bidh mi ann nuair a bhios am bus ann!
Last edited by faoileag on Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
GunChleoc
Rianaire
Posts: 4607
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:26 am
Language Level: Mion-chùiseach
Corrections: Please correct my grammar
Location: Dùthaich mo chridhe
Contact:

Unread post by GunChleoc »

:naire: Tapadh leibh! :flur:

that would make it far an do rugadh then (if you're using far that is)
Oileanach chànan chuthachail
Na dealbhan agam
neoni
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:57 pm
Corrections: I'm fine either way
Location: am badeigin

Unread post by neoni »

yup, but i think far is a bit of an anglicism there and that "an taigh san (anns an) do rugadh mi" is better, but if anybody can confirm/deny i'd be very pleased.
GunChleoc
Rianaire
Posts: 4607
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:26 am
Language Level: Mion-chùiseach
Corrections: Please correct my grammar
Location: Dùthaich mo chridhe
Contact:

Unread post by GunChleoc »

Chan eil càil a fhios agamsa :chafhios:

Cò aig a tha fios? Image
Oileanach chànan chuthachail
Na dealbhan agam
Post Reply