Pronunciation of laigh/nigh/ruith in past & present tense

Ciamar a chanas mi.... / How do I say...
virtualvinodh
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 11:18 pm
Language Level: Beginner
Corrections: Please correct my grammar
Location: Cill Rìmhinn (St Andrews), Alba
Contact:

Pronunciation of laigh/nigh/ruith in past & present tense

Unread post by virtualvinodh » Sun Feb 16, 2014 12:24 am

Hi,

I had past covered in my class last week. My Gaelic teacher (from Harris) said there is a slight difference between in the pronunciation of the following verbs, even though they are spelt same in past and present tense:

laigh, nigh, ruith

If I heard correctly, /l/,/n/,/r/ were all dental and velarised in the present tense, but quite normal in the past. (or perhaps, it was the other way around).

Is this a dialectal thing or a general rule of pronunciation ?

V


Gàidhlig a-mhàin | Gàidhlig gu brath |

An Inseannach in Alba learning Gàidhlig Albannach :)

http://www.virtualvinodh.com

Seonaidh
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:00 pm
Corrections: I'm fine either way
Location: Faisg air Gleann Rathais

Re: Pronunciation of laigh/nigh/ruith in past & present tens

Unread post by Seonaidh » Sun Feb 16, 2014 2:08 am

In the past tense, the verb is usually discumbobulated - or lenited. Thus, most verbs are identical in the 2nd singular command form and the active past form - apart from sèimheachadh. e.g.
cuir - chuir (put etc.)
freagair - fhreagair (answer)
laigh - laigh (lie)
nigh - nigh (wash)
ruith - ruith (run)
seall - sheall (l00k)
...and so on. But you'll notice that those verbs starting with consonants that don't show a change with sèimheachadh are just the same. Whether they SOUND the same of not is probably up to you. In the case of "laigh", quite often they do, because not much happens with a broad L But with, e.g. lean - lean (follow), a narrow L, the LY sound at the start tends to become just L (but not broad). With N and R, some claim there's a sound difference, but it's not easy to detect. In essence, the tendency for narrow N to be NY vanishes.

GunChleoc
Rianaire
Posts: 4452
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:26 am
Language Level: Mion-chùiseach
Corrections: Please correct my grammar
Location: Dùthaich mo chridhe
Contact:

Re: Pronunciation of laigh/nigh/ruith in past & present tens

Unread post by GunChleoc » Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:52 am

Ah, orthography and the worship of the written word strikes again...

Everybody and his brother will teach you that l, n and r don't lenite. This is not true - they don't lenite in writing. When people speak, they do.

The rules about which of these 3 sounds does what exactly are different for each of them: There used to be four of each, but there are only 3 now, and the loss did not happen in a regular fashion. So, don't make the mistake that I did and try to learn the rules for all 3 at once, because then you won't remember which is which.

http://www.akerbeltz.org/index.php?titl ... _in_Gaelic

http://www.akerbeltz.org/index.php?titl ... _L_N_and_R
Oileanach chànan chuthachail
Na dealbhan agam

Níall Beag
Rianaire
Posts: 1353
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 6:58 pm
Language Level: Cofhurtail (chan ann bho thùs)
Corrections: I'm fine either way
Location: Sruighlea, Alba
Contact:

Re: Pronunciation of laigh/nigh/ruith in past & present tens

Unread post by Níall Beag » Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:58 am

virtualvinodh wrote:If I heard correctly, /l/,/n/,/r/ were all dental and velarised in the present tense, but quite normal in the past. (or perhaps, it was the other way around).
As Seonaidh has already said, these are lenited sounds, even though the lenition is not marked. "Lenition" is basically Latin for "weakening". This typically means that lenited sounds have a more neutral mouth-shape than unlenited ones. So if the strong sound is velarised, the weak sound is less velarised. If the strong sound is palatised, the weak sound is less palatised. Etc.

virtualvinodh
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 11:18 pm
Language Level: Beginner
Corrections: Please correct my grammar
Location: Cill Rìmhinn (St Andrews), Alba
Contact:

Re: Pronunciation of laigh/nigh/ruith in past & present tens

Unread post by virtualvinodh » Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:56 pm

Níall Beag wrote:
virtualvinodh wrote:If I heard correctly, /l/,/n/,/r/ were all dental and velarised in the present tense, but quite normal in the past. (or perhaps, it was the other way around).
As Seonaidh has already said, these are lenited sounds, even though the lenition is not marked. "Lenition" is basically Latin for "weakening". This typically means that lenited sounds have a more neutral mouth-shape than unlenited ones. So if the strong sound is velarised, the weak sound is less velarised. If the strong sound is palatised, the weak sound is less palatised. Etc.
Thanks !

V
Gàidhlig a-mhàin | Gàidhlig gu brath |

An Inseannach in Alba learning Gàidhlig Albannach :)

http://www.virtualvinodh.com

bb3ca201
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 11:39 pm
Language Level: intermediate/advanced
Corrections: I'm fine either way
Location: Chan eil fhios
Contact:

Re: Pronunciation of laigh/nigh/ruith in past & present tens

Unread post by bb3ca201 » Tue May 06, 2014 5:08 pm

virtualvinodh wrote:Hi,

I had past covered in my class last week. My Gaelic teacher (from Harris) said there is a slight difference between in the pronunciation of the following verbs, even though they are spelt same in past and present tense:

laigh, nigh, ruith

If I heard correctly, /l/,/n/,/r/ were all dental and velarised in the present tense, but quite normal in the past. (or perhaps, it was the other way around).

Is this a dialectal thing or a general rule of pronunciation ?

V
There is a difference in pronounciation which, even though I've been learning and speaking Gaelic for years, I can't even nail. I'm still trying to get a handle on it, though...

Post Reply